Skip to main content

Prejury

Prejury is good chance to see mistake in project. In prejury, there should be product but it should not be finished. It is kind of queen critic before jury. Let me talk about my project and my mistakes about prejury :

  • I have triangular terrain in batıkent and its sizes are pretty big when it compared with surround terrains. First thing what I try to do is about shaping my house around my terrain. So I started to work on terrain-house relation. Creating something in triangular manner can not be useful. First thing what I learnt it is this. With this obstacle I decided to shape my house around road and plantation conditions.
  • Scale issue became a huge problem for me. My terrain gave a false impression to me and unfortunately there is huge rooms occured because of this reason. Till this day I avoid working with tefriş(furniture). Actually even if I worked with it, maybe I did not encounter with this situation. Scale issue is my real problem in here. Almost all of my jury time general comments about my project continue around it.
  • Other comment about my house is related with my observations. In my observations, there are location of plantations and if I use them to rotate and shape my house it will be much more greatful.
  • And last thing about house is related with interaction with surround. There are very very little house which are adjoint and if my project show that how it benefit from their connection and scale issues, there may be some new kind of things can be revealed.Whatever here is my prejury poster and my pre-house which has scale problem:







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS: KHAN SHATYR

Each structure has its own story. And this is Khan Shatyr's one. For Arch372 lesson we choose a structure and examine its structural details. We find Khan Shatyr as interesting and made research about it. Tension of roof, its durability, materials, technique of construction is quite different from other ones. And here some explanative poster about structure with diagrams.  

Sketch Problem

After first pre-jury, new sketch problem assignment take to each group. In there, question is simple: What will be happen to Çukurambar next years/decades. Sketches can be include utopic ideas or it may stand on realistic things. Me and my group can not defend any certain idea. There are both of these things and it is kind of debate about what will happen if there is realistic things happen or what happen with utopic ideas. Here what we reach:

Architectural tour in Ankara (04 assignment)

          It was a rainy day… Again noone has no idea what we are doing… This is a kind of principles of being architechture student. Sounds echoing like “its up to you!” in studio.Then we recognized that nothing can be same after this trip… Here comes new assignment. Last friday we take an architectural tour in Ankara and we have to focus light and shadow qualities in Buildings. In poster (which is on the left) you can see old buildings. They may seem like normal structure but when we think that 1920-30s, they are really important and well designed buildings for Ankara.  Also there are more photos when i took this trip. I didn't add these pictures to my poster thats why i couldnt find exact texture in these photos.