ARCHITECTONIC IDEAS

Here is final work about my project. As you know we worked on eymir and try to create route for 1,5 and 15 people. Some parts of roads define much more sensible space and they became place in this assignment. I have two different road for eymir and I just use north side of it. Here is my final work:  

For final assignment, I made model which is related with my design principles. Its just a little part of my pier. Its scale is 1/20 and I just want to show how different materials come together and how design work with materials. So this model includes both little part of design and tecnical properties of my model.   Also, I wrote some information about detail of my model. here is my report: Keeping natures own quality is important issue for open spaces. To supply this, materials which are prefer in design, should have connection with nature. In my eymir model, my main idea is relating with how can I specify different spaces while I prefer natural route. There are two main route in my model and both of them in the north. One of them benefit from slope, density of tree, wind and these kind of qualities while other one is much more related with reeds, lake. These different sources also affect details of my places. To better perception of my detail model which is pa...

After prejury, I decided to reconsider my path and where my path become a space how can it change and this kind of thoughts. This picture is taken in next week of prejury. And prejury is like a wound for me. I hope I will cure this wound in Jury. Actually my relation between coffee is not well designed (lol) but sometimes it really works if its drip coffee. There is no more critic and we submitted our models. There is almost no connection between my prejury model and my final model(s). Even using parts are same, there are lots of differentiation and I hope that I will handle my Jury. Next post will be include my final models and detailed part of it. Just wait. Final model post is coming!

From first day to last day, there are lots of changing in my model. Defining enclosure is act in same manner and it affect whole project negatively. Here is some  parts which I do not have in my final model

From start to end, every critic change proces of project. Especially after prejury, my project really encounter some problems and still I work on how can i improve something. In this post you can see my ideas which are mostly do not have any relation 1/200 SCALED PLAN MODELS Here is my first idea about pier. I just want to make connection with lake and reeds. For reaching this aim There is both upside and downside places. Upside one is not work and downside one should be improve. So I abandon this idea. In there, my plan is related with defining enclosure areas but almost whole of the studio work on this kind of structure. I still do not give up this idea but in my 1/200 scaled model I work like this in whole of model. So it seems like still valid in Jury but Im not sure how can I apply this                               DETAIL MODEL     ...

In this assignment, we try to make dome. Actually its half sphere shape create problem between materials. My Dome is not like reach aim totally but if my technique use for making dome, number of corner should be increased (about 10 or more than) So here is my Dome model:

For Final Draft, we should make a timeline which related with architectural concept or an architecture element. Before that we wrote something about our concepts and it include some basic ideas. Now I just draft my little part of my timeline.

The Renaissance : Ideal and Fad After changing islamic culture of Spain, some new culture occur like Gothic chapel. King also wanted to decrease importance of mosques and for that reason whether mosques turn into church or near mosques some huge cristian structures built. But there are some duality because structure of mosque and church is different. To understand whether its church or mosque some kind of symbol needed. This confusion is also appropriate for architecture. For instance in Alhambra, classical forms, tuscan columns, head of the columns are from ionic era and interestingly, there is nothing relate with gothic era.   Leon battista Alberti is member of new architecture trends in Florence. When you look at the city, you can ignore old cities quality and also you may relate past and future and analyse it. One of them glorious past and other one is study of humanities and this situation makes it modern. It also affect art and we can see it in Brunelleschi. He tra...